R O I S
R O I S
  • HOME
  • SOLUTIONS
    • ROIs Crew Mgmt
    • Polaris Resource Mgmt
    • Solaris Fares Mgmt
  • CASE
    • ROIs Crew Mgmt
    • Polaris Resource Mgmt
    • Solaris Fares Mgmt
  • News
  • ABOUT
    • Corporate Overview
  • CONTACT
  • More
    • HOME
    • SOLUTIONS
      • ROIs Crew Mgmt
      • Polaris Resource Mgmt
      • Solaris Fares Mgmt
    • CASE
      • ROIs Crew Mgmt
      • Polaris Resource Mgmt
      • Solaris Fares Mgmt
    • News
    • ABOUT
      • Corporate Overview
    • CONTACT
  • HOME
  • SOLUTIONS
    • ROIs Crew Mgmt
    • Polaris Resource Mgmt
    • Solaris Fares Mgmt
  • CASE
    • ROIs Crew Mgmt
    • Polaris Resource Mgmt
    • Solaris Fares Mgmt
  • News
  • ABOUT
    • Corporate Overview
  • CONTACT

ROIs Crew Management Solution

ROIs Crew Management Solution is a cutting-edge system designed to optimize crew scheduling and enhance airline operational efficiency. With a significant improvement in optimization speed, the solution shortens rostering cycles, saves in resource planning, and increases crew satisfaction while reducing operational costs. Leveraging advanced machine learning and neural networks, it provides real-time, customizable decision-making capabilities, enabling robust planning and improved crew utilization. This innovation drives significant cost savings and productivity gains, potentially increasing airline revenue.

Crew Core-Pairing Optimizer

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Manual processes resulting in inaccurate pairing
  • Slow performance for a single pairing run
  • Decision making limited by a lack of multiple scenario comparison

Values:

  1. AI Powered Optimization
  2. Multiple scenarios with multiple rulesets
  3. Multiple KPI objectives considered 

  • Performance Enhancement → Up to 50% Optimizer run time saving
  • Productivity Improvement → Duty Days decrease, Block Hours Increase  
  • Cost Savings → Up to 5.4% Operation cost reduction

Key Features:

  • Flexible mode to manage volatile and changing schedules
  • Customized pairing label adapts to business  and regulatory changes
  • Integrates information from historical data (flight irregularities, crew absenteeism, etc.) to create a better executable roster
  • Swiftly addresses impromptu situations like extensive flight or regulatory modifications, crew strikes, and more. 

Case Study

Crew Core-Roster Optimizer

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Manual process requiring a large number of planning resources
  • Limited scope to consider all the legalities leading to inefficient rosters and unhappy crew
  • Unable to handle special situations such as a public health emergency

Values:

  1. Comprehensive legality consideration
  2. User defined optimization process
  3. Balance crew for multiple bases
  4. Configurable for customized requirement 

  • Resource Planning → 50% savings on number of Planners & 75% savings on Optimizer run time
  • Crew Satisfaction → Fairness improved by 40% & Crew Satisfaction by 20%+

Key Features:

  • Innovative Hybrid Optimization manages constantly changing trends and rapidly moves crews from multiple bases to high demand airports
  • Integrates Crew scheduling with additional training requirements 
  • Incorporates various fairness criteria, including flying hours, days off, route type, layover station, leave, and standby.
  • Reduce fatigue risk by creating well-balanced, high-quality rosters that prioritize rest and work equilibrium

Case Study

Crew Core-Crew Tracking

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Poor executable scheduling
  • Manually managing crew absences and identifying the most suitable crew members for replacement resulting in low productivity and service gaps

Values:

  1. Automated best-fit crew recommendations
  2. Automated crew absence handling
  3. Automated interface to capture and update crew qualifications
  4. Disruption analysis embedding prevention measurement in the planning phase

  • Planning Robustness → Potential disruption alerts & recovery response
  • Operation Quality → Reduced human errors

Key Features:

  • Automatically check legality in real time
  • Offer optimal fit and standby functions to resolve irregularities
  • Analyze historical data to provide feedback on improving roster quality for future disruptions
  • Paperless e-flight log for accurate & prompt post flight data collection
  • Auto process trip trade
  • Automated best-fit crew recommendation & crew absence handling

Case Study

Crew Training-Training Optimizer

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Manual training assignment resulting in errors and lapse of qualifications
  • Update between TMS and Crew management systems done manually
  • Manual qualifications management

Values:

  1. Recency training optimization
  2. Automated qualification projection
  3. Automated actualization process

  • Productivity Improvement → 21% reduction in initial and promotion courses
  • Training Management Enhancement → Automation, planning with insights

Key Features:

  • Increase monthly optimization to 3 months to cover the whole initial line training period
  • Assign training in stages while ensuring full compliance with business rules and restrictions
  • User configurable rules to cope with different AOC requirements
  • Automated scheduling of both cadets’ ab-initio training and recurrent trainings
  • Optimized training duration to increase crew utilization

Case Study

Crew Care-Crew Preference

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Unable to accommodate crew flight requests and duty swaps
  • Lack of effective approach to motivate or penalize crew
  • High absentee rate due to demoralized crew

Values:

  1. Accommodates crew requests and swaps  
  2. Considers crew special requests
  3. Automates crew absence process

  • Crew Satisfaction → Crew survey shows 21% satisfaction improvement
  • Crew Absence Rate  → Improvement from 2.1% to 0.8%

Key Features:

  • Accommodates preferences and duty swaps
  • Automated crew absence process using Crew App
  • Point-based system to influence crew behavior throughout crew planning life cycle
  • Improves crew satisfaction and quality of life
  • Improves operational stability and reduces flight disruptions caused by crew member absenteeism

Case Study

Crew Care-Swap & Open Time

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Reduced Crew Morale: Inability to swap duties lead to dissatisfaction and low morale
  • Operational Inefficiencies: Difficulty in covering open duties result in understaffed flights, delays, or cancellations
  • Increased Administrative Burden: Manual adjustments and finding replacements incur errors

Values:

  • Accommodates crew requests and swaps  
  • Considers crew special requests
  • Automates crew absence process
  • Crew Satisfaction → Crew survey shows 21% satisfaction improvement

Key Features:

  • Customers defined Swap Rules
  • Privacy and Anonymity in Swaps
  • Publish and Discover Swap Opportunities
  • Pre-Check before any duty swap is finalised
  • Real Time Updates and Notifications
  • Integration with Crew Portal

Case Study

Crew Care-Layover Manager

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Incomplete settlement approval process, prone to fraudulent accounts during settlement review
  • Lack of real-time process monitoring and outdated management methods prevent quality assurance in real-time, leading to resource wastage

Values:

  1. Precisely controls crew duty period
  2. Digital standardisation of logistics support
  3. Improve management efficiency 

  • Improved cost control 
  • Electronic reconciliation 

Key Features:

  • Manages the entire business process from accommodation allocation, pick-up, check-in, departure, drop-off to service evaluation
  • Improves the airline's management service level
  • Effectively regulates crew layover services and significantly reduces associated costs

Case Study

Crew Care-Leave Manager (Point Award)

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Lack of an effective tool to deliver schedule fairness with transparency
  • Lack of a logical mechanism to handle crew requests with transparency and fairness

Values:

  • Flight - Request and Bidding, Duty Swap, Pick up/ Volunteer, Drop Off
  • Stand By -  Pick up/Volunteer, Drop off
  • Leave
  • Redemption

Key Features:

  • Innovative reward mechanism to achieve transparency and fairness
  • Apply point management system throughout crew planning life cycle
  • Implement a system that includes motivational incentives and penalty structures to encourage desired behaviors 
  • Create a transparent and fairly balanced working environment 

Case Study

Crew Care-Allowance

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Numerous types of allowances
  • Each type of allowance has complex calculation rules and lacks flexible configuration
  • Different calculation methods for allowances need to be set for different groups of crew members

Values:

  • Real-time and Effective Allowance Management
  • Effective Calculation and Publishing → Reduced Manual Errors and Efforts
  • Allowance Adjustment Capabilities → providing flexibility to make necessary adjustments 

Key Features:

  • Multiple calculation rules for allowances can be configured.
  • Different types of allowances can be set
  • Different allowance rates can be configured for various crew groups, with support for setting priorities
  • Allowance simulations can be performed based on crew rosters within different time frames
  • Allowance calculations and publishing can be carried out for active rosters, with the option for fine-tuning allowances

Case Study

Crew Intelligence-Post Operation Analysis

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Need tools to provide business Insights to improve operational robustness

Values:

  • Learn and apply cost control to avoid hotel and deadhead  leakage 
  • Apply crew preferences into planning for enhanced fairness to increase crew satisfaction and to reduce crew absenteeism rate
  • Apply top disruption prevention measures to reduce operational irregularities

Key Features:

  • Crew and flight performance
  • Crew preference
  • Standby utilization
  • Operational cost
  • Top disruptions

Case Study

Crew Intelligence-Workforce Forecasting

Pain Points & Requirements:

  • Manually deriving forecasts through Excel formulas
  • Inadequate coverage of comprehensive planning legalities
  • Challenging to predict the crew count for each rank while ensuring full coverage of total flying hours
  • Unable to create accurate crew schedule

Values:

  1. Simulate manpower planning 
  2. What-if scenario-based analysis with rostering constraint changes
  3. Consider legality rules and crew absence

  • Robust Planning → Achieving planning accuracy
  • Quality Decision → Data-driven for better decision making

Key Features:

  • Enhance optimizers forecast for long-term crew requirement 
  • Utilize historical data analysis for predicting crew requirements
  • Account for crew rules and constraints
  • Enhanced precision and forecasting through consideration of multiple scenarios

Case Study

ROIs Solution Advantages

ROIs

Copyright © 2024 ROIs - All Rights Reserved.

Compliance with Canadian Laws and Regulations. 


As a Canadian-based company, ROIs is fully committed to adhering to the highest standards of compliance with Canadian laws and regulations. We prioritize data privacy and security, ensuring that our practices align with regional and industry-specific requirements.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept